Saturday, January 31, 2009
Mommy and Me
Thursday, January 29, 2009
On pumping
Several friends of mine emailed me this week to let me know about an article in a recent New Yorker on the topic of the breast pump and the phenomenon of pumping. One friend was kind enough to forward me the electronic link, as she's a subscriber, and I took her advice and read the article, yes, while pumping at work.
I got my Medela Freestyle -- a small but costly device -- with all of the other baby paraphernalia well before Oliver was born. On the one hand, it kind of saved my butt -- or breasts, I guess -- since I had such a hard time getting him to nurse. On the other hand, would I have persisted more in getting him latched, despite frustrations, if it hadn't been available? Like so many things in childrearing, it's hard to know as I can't go back and do it again. It did make me feel better to get him off the formula as quickly as possible and onto all breastmilk, even though it was through a bottle. And I did persist with the breastfeeding, as it's a far cry more convenient, in my opinion, than pumping and bottling.
The author of the article seemed to be focused on the conflation of the terms breastfeeding (or nursing) and feeding a baby breastmilk. Thanks to the popularity and accessibility of affordable breastpumps, these two things are no longer one and the same. The author's message, however, remains a bit of a mystery to me. Perhaps I'm just not a strong enough reader, but I often get lost in New Yorker articles -- they just go all over the place. The author aruges at one point that the benefits of breastfeeding have to do with "cuddling your baby" or that they come from "smiling and cuddling," but acknowledges in the same paragraph that this is "stuff that people who aren't breast-feeding can give babies, too." The author notes how odd it is that breast pumps are used as a way to encourage breastfeeding, since you don't need the former to do the latter. Said author acknowledges in the same article, though, that a breast pump is essential for women who can't be or choose not to be tethered to their infant 24/7 for the duration of breastfeeding (for most women, just a few months, but for others 6-12 months or even more). For those of us who work outside the home -- or any woman who wants to get out on her own for a few hours -- a breast pump is a necessary evil. It's dreadfully boring and tedious to pump, and it's annoying to constantly be washing pump pieces and bottles, but it's nice to be able to assuage some of the guilt one feels in returning to work. The author further argues that in some cases breast pumps encourage women to pump and bottle rather than nurse. To this, I would respond, 1) where is the data for that?and 2) so what? If women choose to do this, isn't that okay? The author herself concedes that the bonding-through-feeding can happen breast or not, and if this method encourages women to serve up "the medical science of human milk," as she calls it, then great! Not every woman finds breastfeeding the "womanly art" that LLLC markets it as. I'll admit to a few blissful moments of staring down at Ollie while he eats, but for the most part, I nurse because it's more convenient for me than pumping all the time and because, based on what I've read, it offers health benefits that formula cannot replicate.
The author of the article seems to suggest that the real solution to getting women to nurse longer, without the contraptions, is at-work childcare centers or longer maternity leave. Of course, with the state of economy what it is, I hardly think this is going to happen for any time soon. For now, the book closet at the back of my classroom and fifteen minutes a morning with my Medela will have to suffice.
I got my Medela Freestyle -- a small but costly device -- with all of the other baby paraphernalia well before Oliver was born. On the one hand, it kind of saved my butt -- or breasts, I guess -- since I had such a hard time getting him to nurse. On the other hand, would I have persisted more in getting him latched, despite frustrations, if it hadn't been available? Like so many things in childrearing, it's hard to know as I can't go back and do it again. It did make me feel better to get him off the formula as quickly as possible and onto all breastmilk, even though it was through a bottle. And I did persist with the breastfeeding, as it's a far cry more convenient, in my opinion, than pumping and bottling.
The author of the article seemed to be focused on the conflation of the terms breastfeeding (or nursing) and feeding a baby breastmilk. Thanks to the popularity and accessibility of affordable breastpumps, these two things are no longer one and the same. The author's message, however, remains a bit of a mystery to me. Perhaps I'm just not a strong enough reader, but I often get lost in New Yorker articles -- they just go all over the place. The author aruges at one point that the benefits of breastfeeding have to do with "cuddling your baby" or that they come from "smiling and cuddling," but acknowledges in the same paragraph that this is "stuff that people who aren't breast-feeding can give babies, too." The author notes how odd it is that breast pumps are used as a way to encourage breastfeeding, since you don't need the former to do the latter. Said author acknowledges in the same article, though, that a breast pump is essential for women who can't be or choose not to be tethered to their infant 24/7 for the duration of breastfeeding (for most women, just a few months, but for others 6-12 months or even more). For those of us who work outside the home -- or any woman who wants to get out on her own for a few hours -- a breast pump is a necessary evil. It's dreadfully boring and tedious to pump, and it's annoying to constantly be washing pump pieces and bottles, but it's nice to be able to assuage some of the guilt one feels in returning to work. The author further argues that in some cases breast pumps encourage women to pump and bottle rather than nurse. To this, I would respond, 1) where is the data for that?and 2) so what? If women choose to do this, isn't that okay? The author herself concedes that the bonding-through-feeding can happen breast or not, and if this method encourages women to serve up "the medical science of human milk," as she calls it, then great! Not every woman finds breastfeeding the "womanly art" that LLLC markets it as. I'll admit to a few blissful moments of staring down at Ollie while he eats, but for the most part, I nurse because it's more convenient for me than pumping all the time and because, based on what I've read, it offers health benefits that formula cannot replicate.
The author of the article seems to suggest that the real solution to getting women to nurse longer, without the contraptions, is at-work childcare centers or longer maternity leave. Of course, with the state of economy what it is, I hardly think this is going to happen for any time soon. For now, the book closet at the back of my classroom and fifteen minutes a morning with my Medela will have to suffice.
His Highness' High Chair
For now, I'm happy that we're all 98% healthy in the house (not including the dog, who's been vomiting around the apartment today...) -- just some stuffy noses here and there, thanks to the permanently sub-20 degree weather in our Chicago winter.
The cereal will come. It may not make him sleep any longer at night, but it will be fun to see.
Monday, January 19, 2009
Crib notes
While it's great that Oliver is in the crib -- I am, with the exception of the last few nights, getting a bit more sleep as a consequence, it is also another indicator that our "little guy" is getting older. He's still a baby, no mistake about that, but he's growing up, if in small ways. Many people keep their kids in their room for up to a year, but that wasn't the choice we made, and we're okay with that. Our apartment is only so big, and I can still hear him coo and fuss and, when congested enough, even breathe.
Nobody tells you that the growing pains people talk about aren't for the kid but the parents.
Getting to know you
The encounter was going well enough until Oliver, in his excitement, began waving his arms around, whacking Lucy in the head. Lucy wasn't mad, but she did start to think about chewing on his fingers and pawing at his head. At which point we ended the interaction.
It will be fun to see the two of them start to play with each other as Lucy gets older. Jack, who is several months older and mobile, is great with
Saturday, January 17, 2009
On strike
Oliver is currently on a nursing strike. His major complaint, I assume, is the difficulty breathing caused by the croup. He's getting all his nutrients from a bottle right now, but I'm hoping that once he's feeling better he'll go back to the breast. All the pumping and storing and heating and washing is exhausting (and drying out my hands something fierce). If not, I don't know if he starts picketing or we go to collective bargaining or what. Anyone had experience with this?
Sick
For now we're listening to make sure his breathing doesn't speed up and he doesn't develop a stridor -- two indicators that he needs to see a doctor. Wes is working all weekend this weekend, so it's me and Ollie hanging out and trying to stay warm -- sometimes hard to do when I have to take the dog out (though one website said that those brief outings can help with any swelling in his airways). His cough is the worst -- just so hacking, and I don't know what to do for it. We don't have a humidifier, but we do put him in his carseat in the bathroom when we shower and let him nap in the carseat as it helps to keep him upright.
Thankfully I have a long weekend this weekend, so I can be with him and monitor how he's doing. If he's still nasty by Wednesday, Wes and I will split the workday so that our sitter doesn't expose her son to him. For now, lots of hugs and cuddles and Kleenex!
Off switch for the mobile
Wednesday, January 14, 2009
You big baby
Oliver had his four-month check-up on Monday. He is 16 lbs., 3 ozs. (75th %tile, which is consistent from birth), 26 inches long (90th %tile, which is a leap from his 2 month apopintment). He has a big head -- a lot bigger than before, in fact -- his percentile went from 25th to 75th, which Wes says it's not supposed to do, but the pediatrician insists in normal at this age. It all seems proportional to me.
After checking out the pediatrician, Oliver flashed some of his best smiles to win her over. It wasn't enough, however, to keep her from sending in the nurse with another rotovirus oral vaccine and four shots. He screamed, as expected, but was pretty easily consoled with hugs and kisses from mom.
After checking out the pediatrician, Oliver flashed some of his best smiles to win her over. It wasn't enough, however, to keep her from sending in the nurse with another rotovirus oral vaccine and four shots. He screamed, as expected, but was pretty easily consoled with hugs and kisses from mom.
Wednesday, January 7, 2009
On lactation
I am proud of the fact that I am taking the time and making the effort to breastfeed, and I plan to do so for as long as it's reasonable. But I have to say, nursing, though it at times makes me feel bonded with my baby, very often makes me feel like other things. Many a woman has made the comparison between the electric breast pump I use each day and those used on dairy farms. This comparison is particularly true when you use, as I do, a hands-free device (Have you ever washed dishes while expressing milk?).
Last night, as I lay in bed nursing Oliver for the umpteenth time, drifting off with my breast still hanging out, I sensed another comparison. These marathon midnight sessions, rare though they are, make me feel less like an all-you-can-eat buffet (after all, there's only one item on the menu) and more like a free-refills soda station. If you just sit there all day with your 99 cent paper cup, you can have a little more, and a little more, and a little more...
Last night, as I lay in bed nursing Oliver for the umpteenth time, drifting off with my breast still hanging out, I sensed another comparison. These marathon midnight sessions, rare though they are, make me feel less like an all-you-can-eat buffet (after all, there's only one item on the menu) and more like a free-refills soda station. If you just sit there all day with your 99 cent paper cup, you can have a little more, and a little more, and a little more...
Ollie's Journal, Weeks 13-16
1. Learned to grab things and hold on. I like to grab mom's sweatshirt when I nurse, her sleeve when she's changing me, the burp cloth when I'm getting burped.
2. Started watching the dog...and she's started licking me on the nose. Ewww.
3. Met in person all that family I've been seeing on the webcam and listening to mom talk to on the phone. They were really nice and seemed to like me, too.
4. Switched from two fingers to my thumb. I'm not sure where to put the rest of the fingers, but the thumb doesn't gag me like those longer fingers.
5. Moved up in diaper size. Now mom has to put them on the second set of snaps. The nice part is that now they don't bunch up so much.
Highlights coming soon: Rolling over (I'm so close!), laughing (I love it when mom bounces me up and down on her belly, and I'm just on the verge of a real, grown-up laugh), and picking things up (trouble!).
Right now:
Asleep in my crib since I didn't take a real nap all day. Oh, no, wait -- waking up from a nap in my crib...
Labels:
diapers,
Lucy the Dog,
milestones,
Oliver,
Ollie's Journal
Dear Husband, Part 33
Oh, well. I guess the child was warm if nothing else.
Napping with Lovie
Friday, January 2, 2009
Lovey/Lovie
Ollie is not, however, the best napper. He fights them tooth and nail and then becomes fussier as he gets more tired. So I thought I'd try the suggestions in the book to help create a nighttime routine, transition him into his crib at home, and hopefully get him down for more regular naps. Wednesday night, when we got home, I'd intended to put him in the crib, but he was wide awake and Wes and I were both dead tired. So into the co-sleeper he went. He babbled and must have at some point just drifted off as I fell asleep before he did, and I heard not a peep for several hours. After 5am, he got kind of fussy and ended up in bed with me for a few more hours of sleep.
Last night, after a 4:30-7pm nap in the stroller while Wes and I were out, Ollie started showing signs of tiredness at 8:15pm. I put on his night diaper, put him in his sleeping bag, nursed him, and -- lo and behold -- he was asleep. I put him in his crib, where he slept contentedly until 2:30am, then from 3-6am. After the 6am feeding, though, Ollie was wide awake. I put him back in his crib, where I heard him chatting. Then a new sound -- Ollie had turned on his mobile -- with his feet. As Wes wasn't due up for work for another hour, I hopped back up and brought the baby into bed with us. He nursed some more and slept some more.
One of the suggestions the author of this book has is to encourage the baby's attachment to a lovey, so that when the baby no longer needs to nurse at night, he can calm himself during night wakings with the lovey instead of mom or dad. Wes and I have had this monkey, now appropriately named Lovie (as in Smith, the coach for the Bears), on Ollie's dresser since he was born. I used this thing to learn nursing positions and we even buckled him into the car seat to try it out. So he was a natural choice. The author suggestions snuggling with the lovey when the baby is sleepy so he associates the toy with falling asleep. So he rocks with us and, as shown, nursed with us.
Right now, the major challenge is napping. The author of the book encourages parents to help their baby sleep with whatever sleep aids are necessary and then work to eliminate the aids after the baby has learned to sleep during that time of day. So where is Ollie now? In the stroller, in the middle of the living room, nestled in with his blanket and Lovie. I rolled him to sleep, and there he'll stay until he wakes up on his own. Eventually we'll have to get rid of the stroller, I know, but for now I'm satisfied that he sleeps well at night and can, perhaps, be cajoled to nap, too.
Meet the Family
This Christmas, Ollie finally met all of my family. Up to now, only my mom and Wes's mom had gotten to meet him. It was fun getting to share him with everyone. My sister was up for everything -- holding him, talking with him, rocking him in the glider, feeding him a bottle, even changing the diapers (and I think I've got her sold now on cloth!). My sister-in-law was great helping him explore his new surroundings and conversing with him as he babbled away. My oldest brother helped him walk the floor and enjoyed carrying around a lighter little one (his 2 1/2-year-old is 40 pounds!). And my other brother did lots of rocking and cuddling, too. My dad made sure to get in plenty of grandpa time and took every opportunity to solicit smiles, which Oliver now readily shares. My mom got to see how much he's grown since her last visit in November -- at 3 weeks, 9 weeks, and 15 weeks, she, better than anyone, has seen him transform. Fortunately, our move down south come June means more trips to see family. Hopefully the next one won't have to wait 3 months to meet the family!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
